This version of ORS 279C.110(1) refers to the wrong subsection. It should refer to subsection (2) not subsection 3)

In trying to find a statute that may regard a complaint towards a business, the way the laws are written, a definition pertaining to dishonesty in pricing and price quotes stated to customers is not easily found, if existing at all.

by ors 351.708 - there should be some reviews. The links to the government website where they seem to be posted don't work because of updating and I can't seem to find it on the new website. Please help - thanks. Sylvia

direct the reader to the Oregon Statute identifying a number of days the recipient has to reply to the public records request!

"counter" needs to be added in front of "affidavit"
in section (a) line 7

http://cases.laws.com/oregon/oregon-a145040-state-v-oidor

Has stated that "Unlawful sound recording" is subject to federal preemption an is no longer valid in regard to recording made after 1972.

But I wanted to mention that this section needs to be updated...

153.633 Distribution to state.

Please restore access to the above sections of the education law.

I have been unable to find the necessary form or instructions of how to fill one out (if there is one). ORS 181.820, just says to petition the court where the crime was committed ( in this case, Marion county, Salem, OR)

I stumbled across your site while preparing for a Fair Hearing coming up on Friday in Western New York.

Thanks for the site.

It now reads: "http://oregonlegalresearch.blogspot.com/2011/01/oregon-law-and-laws-online-ha-ha-ha.html" really! ha-ha-ha?

When a search parameter such as sheriff's oath of office is used it shoul function

Crosllinks on http://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/469B.403 not functioning, stating bad links.

I'm on this page:
http://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/811.028

Where it says this:
See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further...

Which is good, but it would be even better if the test "Preface to Oregon Revised Statues" was linked to whatever that is. (I'm about to go searching for it now ... never heard of if before...)

where can I get a hard copy of the rental laws of oregon

"Sec. 4. Section 3 (sic?) of this 2013 special session Act [633.738] does not apply to any local measure that was:
(1) Proposed by initiative petition and, on or before January 31, 2013, qualified for placement on the ballot in a county; and (2) Approved by the electors of the county at an election held on May 20, 2014. [2013 s.s.1 c.4 §4]"

This does not make sense, which is why I put the "(sic?)" after "Section 3." It should be Section 2.

One wonders whether it crept in when being posted here, or in the actual signed law.

It would be good to have preambles of statutes available, for determination of legislative intent. I am currently involved in a case where the defendant is saying that ORS 633.738 is only for GMOs.

90.412(4)(b): first line reads: "The violation concerns the tenants conduct" but both good grammar and the official statute put an apostrophe in tenant's.