Public.Law Feedback Forum

The place to post ideas and feedback about oregonlaws.org and the public.law sites: Texas, New York, California, and Nevada.

Public.Law Feedback Forum

Categories

(thinking…)

I suggest you ...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  1. make a hyperlink

    I'm on this page:
    http://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/811.028

    Where it says this:
    See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further...

    Which is good, but it would be even better if the test "Preface to Oregon Revised Statues" was linked to whatever that is. (I'm about to go searching for it now ... never heard of if before...)

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  2. install a link to file a complaint or clarification on a law.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  3. Thank you

    Rob: Just wanted to say thanks for the website. I have used it both for school and at work. Very helpful! Please keep it up.

    Chris G. (Oregon City)

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  4. Fix the "bad link" in paragraph 1

    On page http://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/442.851

    Amounts collected by the Oregon Patient Safety Commission under ORS 442.850 (Fees) may not exceed $1.5 [bad link] million for the fiscal year beginning on July 1, 2007, and ending on June 30, 2008.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  5. Add the Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  6. Include section numbers in TOC. Ex. NY CPL Part I 2 & 3 means nothing, but 1 to 30.30 is helpful

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  7. Add ORS Chapter 447

    The links don't seem to work (e.g., in ORS 455.132)... and it's missing from the Title 36 list.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  8. Robb, you totally screwed up CPLR Article 50, otherwise great work.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  9. Make a favorites tab

    If there were particular statutes I want to prioritize, I could see them w/out needing the research trail.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  10. It would be good to have preambles available

    It would be good to have preambles of statutes available, for determination of legislative intent. I am currently involved in a case where the defendant is saying that ORS 633.738 is only for GMOs.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  11. Allow searching for near-matches and synonyms

    Please change "slung shot" to slingshot. It just bugs me.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  12. How are you getting NY statutes nightly?

    Last I checked they were blocking IP addresses pretty aggressively. A great project though--I hope it gains traction.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  13. How to find the reviews required

    by ors 351.708 - there should be some reviews. The links to the government website where they seem to be posted don't work because of updating and I can't seem to find it on the new website. Please help - thanks. Sylvia

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  14. Allow a way to eliminate prior search terms and searches

    Tie your service to the delete files or clean up operations provided by Microsoft or services like Norton

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  15. move Chapter 131A (Civil Forfeiture)

    Chapter 131A on civil forfeiture should follow Chapter 131 as it is part of the Oregon Criminal Code.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  16. complement

    Your outlining of the codes are very easy to follow--unlike the PRC, the authors of which need to go back to the 5th grade and learn how to prepare an outline.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  17. post minimum fines for offenses.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  18. Site problem

    I LOVE your website. I am a police officer in Eugene and use it just about everyday.

    Today though when I use the search from within the site it gives me code in the highlighted areas. Just thought you'd like to know.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  19. Where did the leadlines from Chapter 657 go?

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  20. Double check the citation noted here

    This version of ORS 279C.110(1) refers to the wrong subsection. It should refer to subsection (2) not subsection 3)

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
1 3 5 6
  • Don't see your idea?