Public.Law Feedback Forum

The place to post ideas and feedback about oregonlaws.org and the public.law sites: TexasNew YorkCalifornia, and Nevada.

Public.Law Feedback Forum

Categories

  1. https://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/166.291

    The law has more text to it, but is missing, there are at least 10 sections to it.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. it looks like there may be a CSS issue with the ORS pages. There's overlapping content on the pages. Thanks

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. I wanted to find out how much, if any, an Urban Renewal District can expand once it is established. There was no way to find that information based on the titles in your menu. Or provide a search bar so people can find particular information that may not be clear under your current menu of items.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. formatting under ORS 90.300 7 c is strange on google chrome 59

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Cannot understand section (2). Makes no sense, please organize information so that I can figure out how many wheelchair signs are needed per parking spaces in a parking lot.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. I protest the ORS 438.430(3) that does not allow the patient a chance to review THEIR OWN lab work for a week (until the authorized physician has a chance to review it). It's MY lab work--why can't I have the results just as soon as the doctor? I am in charge of my own health. Plus, it would give me a reference point when the doctor DOES call me with results.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. On the 'About' page, please include data that will allow people to cite you as a reference in their papers

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. https://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/750.005 has an error/typo.
    Section (6), subsection (iii) cannot be read clearly as it is lodged halfway underneath section (6), subsection (ii). The latter, "Laboratory;" cannot be seen clearly because it is under "Hospitalization;".

    Thanks!

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. The links on this page are not responding as I get an error message, e.g. 403 Forbidden, nginx/1.3.7

    Thanks for letting me give some feedback,
    JJ

    P.S. I use your site on a daily basis for my research for Police Officer and Firefighter legal matters, Thanks Again!

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. ORS 18.966 is blank. As are many other entries in the 18.9XX area

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. ORS 18.999 links to a blank page.

    PS Thanks for this fabulous website!

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. https://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/326.111 section (14) the repeal text is obscuring the text behind it. The repealed text should either have a strikethrough, or moved to another section with notes to indicate its repeal, but in such a way as to allow the text to be read. As it stands, it is not readable. Sec. 2. Repeal. Section 1 of this 2015 Act is repealed on December 31, 2016. [2015 c.728 §2]

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. https://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/329.860 is missing the following text :
    Education service districts, school districts or schools, or any combination thereof, may contact any eligible elementary or secondary school student and the student’s family if the student has ceased to attend school to encourage the student’s enrollment in an education program that may include alternative learning options. If the student or the family cannot be located, the name and last-known address shall be reported to the school nearest the address. The school shall attempt to determine if that student or family is being provided services by this state and shall seek to assist…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. You are awesome -- getting statutes in basic text is aweful. It might be nice if on the right side the statute I went to stayed visible, but very minor issue

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. For some reason the 2020 ORS doesn't include 659A.001 on the site.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. text is overlapping

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. If you just click on Volume 1, Chapter 30, the first part of Chapter 30 is missing. If I search for the specific part of the beginning of Chapter 30 that I'm interested in, I can find it.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. Please make the text of statutes easier to print. Control A and Control P make printing burdensome as they include all side panels and unrelated links to be printed as more or less, a 'screenshot'. Keep it simple please.

    Tim Greer, Officer of an Oregon P.C.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?